Even though the scientist and the authors of the sources provided think they are non-living, I beg to differ. I think that they are living things. In a living thing, they should meet the 8 criterias: Movement, Excretion, Irritability/Sensibility, Growth, Reproduction, Adaptability and Nutrition.
Even though the feathers do not excrete or take in nutritions, they still move, they still grow and reproduce.
A feather has 23 functions. Examples would be to trap air to keep the bird warm, they can even control to what certain length they want to spread out their wings. When their old feathers die out, new ones grow back again. The feathers can even trap air. Even though feathers do not have nerves, they do stimulate nerves that surround where the feather attaches to the bird. Birds can adjust the position of their feathers and posture depending on the stimulation of the nerves which shows that they have the irritability/sensibility. Even after the old feathers have molted, the new ones still grow back, still reproduce and grow to a certain size.
So, though the feathers do not take in nutrition or excrete, they meet the rest of the criteria. Like, they can move the feathers to enable them to fly, which meets the movement criteria. Birds can adjust the position of their feathers and posture depending on the stimulation of the nerves which shows that they have the irritability/sensibility and adaptability. The feathers also grow up to a certain size which meets the "Growth" criteria. When its time for molting, they reproduce the feathers, new feathers grow, which meets the "Reproduction criteria." Also, they have so many functions. Though the scientists say that the feathers are non-living things, they WERE once a living thing when there was blood supply to them.
Therefore, I think that feathers are living things.
Resoucrces
http://askabiologist.asu.edu/research/bird_feathers/
http://www.earthlife.net/birds/feathers.html
http://www.treeswallowprojects.com/cfeather.html
April(3)